Decentralised Finance (DeFi), pioneered by Nakamoto’s Bitcoin, has been seen by many as the answer to all the financial problems that the world has. The idea is that the power is taken from the government and corporate behemoths and returned to the hands of the money owners themselves. The problem that this solves is the lack of freedom that comes from having your money in banks, regulated and monitored by the government.
While this idealistic notion is noble, there are concerns that it raises, especially with how the industry has developed over the years. As is the case with everything that connects humans with finances, there have been myriad scams and loss of lifetime savings. Like I mentioned, this isn’t a novel happening, but the distinct and defining difference between TradFi and DeFi is that the users are protected in the former, but the same removal of governmental/corporate responsibility that empowers users in DeFi is exactly what leaves them exposed and subject to the consequences of their unwise decisions or the activity of malicious actors.
DeFi refers to programs and applications built on a decentralised blockchain platform that support financial services. It includes a spectrum of applications and services including staking and rewards services, lending services, decentralised crypto exchanges, insurance, etc.DeFi uses blockchain technology to remove the need for intermediaries. Smart contracts, self-executing agreements coded into the blockchain, automate these activities.
As DeFi grows and attracts more investors, the need for clear regulations cannot be overemphasized. While there are many benefits to this new space, it also raises concerns about user protection, anti-money laundering, and other existing financial regulations. A clear legal framework will help DeFi succeed by building trust and curtailing illegal activities.
In this article, we will examine the legal challenges in DeFi, including consumer protection, anti-money laundering, and know-your-customer (KYC). We aim to understand the current legal situation for DeFi and how it affects users, developers, and regulators.
Different countries have different laws for DeFi. For example, the United States has agencies like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) overseeing DeFi. The SEC has taken an active stance on DeFi, asserting its jurisdiction over certain tokens as securities. The Howey Test is often used to determine whether a digital asset/token qualifies as a security. If they qualify, DeFi platforms offering such tokens may be subject to registration, disclosure, and investor protection requirements.
The CFTC has also shown interest in DeFi, particularly as relates to derivatives and commodities-based tokens. Platforms offering these products may fall under the CFTC's regulatory purview, requiring compliance with the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA).
Lastly, FinCEN is responsible for overseeing CFT and AML regulations. As with traditional financial institutions, DeFi platforms may be subject to AML/CFT regulations enforced by FinCEN. This includes implementing CFT/KYC procedures and reporting suspicious activities.
The European Union has similar agencies. They are the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) and the European Banking Authority (EBA). ESMA is responsible for overseeing the securities markets within the EU. DeFi platforms operating within the EU may be subject to existing regulations, such as the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II) and the Prospectus Regulation, depending on the nature of their services.
The EBA, on the other hand, focuses on banking and payment services. While its direct involvement in DeFi is limited, it has issued guidelines and recommendations about the risks associated with crypto-assets, including those used in DeFi.
In Asia, countries like China, Japan, and South Korea have their own DeFi rules. In China, crypto trading and ICOs are banned. Any DeFi activities within the country are subject to severe restrictions. Japan, on the other hand, has a relatively progressive stance on cryptocurrencies and has established a regulatory framework for crypto asset exchanges. While specific DeFi regulations are still developing, the authorities are closely monitoring the sector. South Korea has also taken steps to regulate cryptocurrencies and is actively considering regulatory measures for DeFi. The Financial Services Commission is the primary regulator in this area.
DeFi works across borders, making it difficult to decide which country's laws apply. This makes it challenging for regulators to enforce rules and protect users. Asides from this, DeFi also presents several fundamental legal challenges:
DeFi is changing really fast, and so laws need to adapt. We might see new rules, stricter enforcement, and more cooperation between countries. With all the regulation, it is pertinent to maintain a main goal - supporting innovation whilst mitigating risk.
DeFi is a new and exciting area of finance, but it needs clear regulation to grow and succeed without further harming users. By working together, regulators, industry experts, and users can create a legal environment that protects everyone and supports DeFi's potential.